So, regarding the question of neural network Darwinism 🧠. You should understand that, essentially, the human brain represents a kind of broad neural network controller. It organizes groups of neurons into layers, and these layers, interacting with each other, form synapses. It is precisely the synapses that determine how generalization will operate.
According to various sources, a single neuron is capable of forming from 10,000 to 60,000 connections. Both numbers are certainly impressive. Through these synaptic connections, neurons perform signal generalization.
From an evolutionary perspective, we as a neural organism have gone further. The peculiarity of our neural system is that we use as the primary unit not so much the neurons themselves as the synapses. Synaptic connections become the key reference point.
From this arises a problem that can be called the problem of neural network Darwinism 🧬. It lies in the fact that we begin to depend on the synaptic connections that are formed. Thus, our nervous system in some sense continues to evolve, but without full control on our part.
The process of neural network Darwinism leads to neurons constantly restructuring synaptic structures by changing their connections. As a result, functions may either strengthen or weaken.
From here arises an important problem of modern medicine 🧪. When we talk about cell therapy, for example the transplantation of stem cells as a method of recovery after neural injuries, a fundamental limitation appears. The issue is not only — and not even primarily — the restoration of the neurons themselves. The problem lies in restoring their synapses, that is, the plasticity of synaptic connections, a fully developed technology for which essentially does not yet exist.
